Issue regarding Legal ability to fight cases using mass media. Shrimp Case study of failure to use propagation.
Today we are fighting an uphilld battle with regards to Communist China. Everybody knows they are heavily subsidizing their industries using the SASAC and major Sovereign Wealth funds. However, the battle then becomes the mass media easily ability to do research. This is because just like any legal case or judge or judge helpers. They look for the most relevant and easily accessible statistics and legal laws. I spent two hours looking for any public media outlet with regards to any graphs or conglomeration of experts on the shrimp case issue. So not only did the judges not find any reality of a push from the world populace. They did not also find any push from the US populace.
Rider I
Logic grids, creation of grids, changing affects, counter logic grids, and then energizing at the right times.
Today we are fighting an uphilld battle with regards to Communist China. Everybody knows they are heavily subsidizing their industries using the SASAC and major Sovereign Wealth funds. However, the battle then becomes the mass media easily ability to do research. This is because just like any legal case or judge or judge helpers. They look for the most relevant and easily accessible statistics and legal laws. I spent two hours looking for any public media outlet with regards to any graphs or conglomeration of experts on the shrimp case issue. So not only did the judges not find any reality of a push from the world populace. They did not also find any push from the US populace.
When I used to work legal cases. We did not just fight stats in the law firm. We used heavy media, stats outputs, experts and even scholarship for reports on issues. So we could plaster the whole cognitional science with our thoughts. So it made it very easy for not only the judges to see our issues. But the fact that the cognitional whole was with us. As folks agreed with regards to statistics and legal works. This is something I see lacking in the Commerce department. The ability to fight Communist China by using scholarly research that is easily accessed with regards to intel, stats, and law.
For example, lets take the next issue we have with Communist China, the cement industry. We see major subsidization of that industry by the Communist Chinese. So what I would do is find a college student and grant them a scholarship for a indepth research article. That is cheaper than our Department of Commerce attorneys to due plus a whole another avenue of logical battles. Then next up I would take a anti trust graduate professor and have them write a piece on how monopolizes using the heavy example of concrete affects the international market place. Then next I would use the media to show the statistics that the Department of Commerce had. So that we could see the research and so that many folks like the Rider I. Could with regards to patriotism follow order and start research on our own. As our leaders of shepards in the Commerce Department let us know way before hand we are going to battle. So we could place articles collections and experts easily in the eyes of the judges for the cases. This strategy is only the scratch of what a good legal analysts can do. You have failed horrible with regards to the WTO US China Shrimp case. Please do not do it again. Right your wrongs and properly fight and shepardsize for the US. If you need an outlien for the cement case on a legal analysts position. Please email me. I need a job. I fought in major international space cases, military cases, political legal cases and local police cases. Thank you do not fail us again. If you where to look into a Chinese search engine in Communist China. You would see their propagation department way out strategized yours for easy access to data on the logica battle field.
Rider I
Logic grids, creation of grids, changing affects, counter logic grids, and then energizing at the right times.
No comments:
Post a Comment