This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger
The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wruckers room

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Grand jury document Violation of Separation of Church and State

52 paper bullets will be sent out in the morning. To prepare or trade policy shift away from the Communist Chinese and towards India. After 30 years they still are doing things like invading smaller countries lands who have way less than them like bullies. 

I would like the Federal Grand Jury to find Communist China guilty of sponsoring terrorism. Then I would like the Grand Jury to fill out the necessary research documents. So that congress may begin to remove Communist China's good trade status. India currently trades with the US at a deficit to the US of 8 billion. While Communist China who sponsors terrorist against India and the US. Trades with the US at a deficit to the US of over $117 billion. I think this countries trade policies need to reflect it cores belief in Democracy and the war against Terrorism. Communist China has not put any money into helping fighting terrorism. As a matter of fact it is my belief that they protect terrorist with their telecommunications, and massive State Owned Enterprises. If the Federal Grand jury could do the necessary research on line and through proper subpoena's of Pentagon, and CIA documents. Then congress could also do a research project would could be more thorough. So that the US could stray away from trading with a Communist non Democracy country and start to direct its trade at Democracy country. That needs it more for its citizens and to defend against the current rise of the Communist Chinese PLA army. Which is currently invading small countries lands in the ocean for more resources. To make matters worse because of this fictional good trade status. The left inside of the USA, has allowed the Communist Chinese to get into US public grammar schools their religious philosophy of a prophet named Confucius. 

Article on unconstitutional allowance by the Leftist political team of the fictional good trade partner Communist China. 

Communist China's Confucius Religion in United States Public Grammar Schools. 
"The violation of Separation of Church and State
is a major deal to Christians in the USA. Many 
Churches and church goers would love to see
the Philosophy of Christ in our public grammar 
schools. However, President Obama has 
allowed Communist China's Confucius religious 
philosophy into our public grammar
schools, but not his own"

Austin Colt
Journalistic Blogger 

The Separation of Church and State is based in Democracies constitutions. The United States constitution does not directly state that. However, the Constitution in the First Amendment does state "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This backbone of the United States's 200 years of cognitional teachings. Has thus been created through social morals of individual consciousness. The Pilgrims fled European religious persecution. As they wished to worship God in their own way. While John Locke who was a very influential scholar in the United States cognitional foundations documents. Bases the fact that states where not able to properly deal with religion in a manner fit for non persecution. This is the idea of individual consciousness is discriminated against once religions and state are entangled. Thomas Jefferson reiterated the same idea's. Which was thus placed in our constitution.

The United States Supreme Court also states that Seperation of Church and state is the right of individual conciousness. In Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional to force other tax paying religions to reimburse a catholic established public grammer school program. Furthering the individual conscious right set by our social and constitional values,
Engel v. Vitale, 82 S. Ct. 1261 (1962)  found that any kind of prayer sponsorship in a public school was unconstitutional government sponsorship of religion. While in Epperson v. Arkansas, 89 S. Ct. 266 (1968) the court decided that it is unconstitutional to favor a religion to stop a teaching of evolution. Then in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 91 S. Ct. 2105 (1971) the US Supreme Court sets out a three part test to regulate the First Amendments separation of church and state clause. Which is defined as:
"1) the government action must have a secular purpose;
2) its primary purpose must not be to inhibit or to advance religion;
3) there must be no excessive entanglement between government and religion."

The social morals of our country along with the cognitional law set by our Supreme Court. Shows that the allowance of religion in our public schools violates the basic right of individual consciousness. As the allowance of one religion will cause discrimination against another religion. As we currently see today with the laws respecting Communist China's Confucianism. Which is being allowed into our public grammar schools. As today we see local governance laws respecting Confucius over any other religion. We see the religion of Confucius being treated in public grammar schools like William Winsor Elementary Schools in Greenville Road Island. Where the respecting local laws allow the public grammar school to have a myriad of religions philosophy books in their libraries and lectures  Or a US High School that does the same thing   While Christian, Muslims, Buddhism, Jewdaism, or Paganism have laws prohibiting the exercise of their religion in our public grammar schools. Especially, in Winsor Elementary School. That school does not have a educational area for the cultures of the Middle East's philosopher Mohammad, or Europe's philosopher of Jesus. That is just one of a myriad of local and international violations of religious Democracies. As President Obama's administration religiously persecutes other religions in favor of the leftist leaning worlds religion of Confucius. As shown with the First lady meeting with public grammar schools that are going through the religious indoctrination of Confucius. However, the First Lady, nor any of President Obama administration meets with public grammar school indoctrination for any other deity that calls for sacrifice or prayer.

The Allowance of Confuscism seems to be a discriminative move by a leftist leaning President to place a leftist country on a pedastal of friendships. Much like the deities statute and ideograms that is prayed to by Confucius Church and religious followers.  This is very appalling to the Christian community and other religious or cultural philosophies communities. That are not allowed into public grammar schools. We see hundreds of Confucius churches not only in the USA! To name a few:  But, also in Communist China and throughout the world. With over, 6, million, world citizens considering Confucius to be a religion. The Deity is Confucius. The Ying and Yang of China's religions and  the religious dimensions of Confucianism more than meet Federally Defined Laws on Religion and Church. While the  As the Confucius Churches have prayer areas, as do any church. While the deity has been a religious icon, since the begging of Confucius as "at the order of the Duke Ai of the State of Lu, who commanded that the Confucian residence should be used to worship and offer sacrifice to Confucius."  In furtherance, many scholars have written books on how Confucsim is a religion.

Today our secular public school system has become "excessive[ly] entanglement between government"  with a leftist religious state sponsored religion and our public grammar schools This is because the leftist Communist Chinese have sold the religion as a communist philosophy and not as a religion. Then this passed President Obama's Administrative Educational Legal Department and Harvard Cultural Friends. As all the Communist Chinese Party members go Harvard. As the government actions see the religion as secular. However, it is not secular as a secular cultural institution would not have used the deities name Confucius, nor the temple ideograms, shrines, or prayer alters in the cultural teachings in our public grammar school classes. While the symbols of their Saints are all through out public grammar school classes  Religion has been implemented into our public schools. Mainly due to the fact that "Chinese popular religion and its complex of pantheon, rituals, and temples [are] easily understood as religion."  As our own culture of Christianity is not allowed to place prayer hands, the deity of Jesus nor his name, let alone the ideograms of our churches or pews. Which are represented in Confucius books and lectures in our public grammar schools.

The primary purpose of these government funded religions programs from Communist China. Is to advance leftist leaning religion in our public schools. The programs do not teach Chinese culture. They teach Confucius deistism and prayers. When they teach their writing skills, it is of the deities Confucius thoughts. Along with that when they teach their heritage it is of the ancient deities prayer rituals or chants of thoughts. While other religions can't get any public cultural or philosphy time to teach religious democracy children. These confucisious programs that use a  "the Han dynasty Emperor Wu Di (156-87 BCE)  proclaimed Confucianism (Rujia) [a] state religion."professed deity.
Where today the Emperor's decree as Confucius as a religion is still on the Chinese law books on page 83
 Much like Roman Emperor Constantine professed Jesus to be a deity or the Persian Emperor Professed Mohammad to be a deity. Seem to have a substantial entangelment into our public school systems and local politics, of goverance. Where many schools have taken large amounts of dollars and given specific allotment of children's time and conscious thought to the religions deity of Confucius.

In the US is it is a wonder that no one has made an outright legal claim, for their own culture or religion. As President Obama's leftist leaning entanglement with the Communist Chinese funded religious programs Confucius. Has received many laws by the State Department, Education Department, Department of Justice respecting the religious deity of Confucius. That religion is something that has a deity, a church, a follower group, and usually a bases of teaching along with chants, praise and rituals. Confucius meets every single requirement to be a religion. Along with that if the program wanted to secular it would not have used a religious ancient deities iconic name. President Obama's administration has violated the most sacred of ancient United States rights. Which is to have individual consciousness in our public schools. So one religion or philosophy with a cultural deity that one prayers to, sacrifices too, and follows ones teachings, religiously, is not placed over another. President Obama has violated the first amendment!

Today the United States has not changed much over 200 years with regards to teaching religion in its schools. The only change we have seen is President Obama and his administration violate social, legal, and equatable rights of every citizen. Today, thousands of persecuted religious individuals run from their countries to come to the United States of America. To practice religion freely without persecution or involvement from the public state sector. However, President Obama and his administration have found it their will to make laws respecting the religious groundwork of Confucius. While equatable prohibiting every other religion that wishes to do the same thing. Thus showing the administrations discrimination to non leftist leaning religions.

These are my beliefs, that Communist China is a Terrorist Sponsor and should have its Good trade status with the US removed. That was given to them by a Senator Dianne Feinstein, who attacked the the Unions  so that her husbands business could get better trading status with Communist China. As moved into buy out our only west coast deep water port. . While President Clinton also had simimlar corrupt dealings with the Communist Chinese. As the was the President who gave them the good trade status due to his heavy corruption and major leaks and selling off of US military to the PLA.

The Communist Chinese have an extensive history and are presently of funding terrorist. The articles below are a small collection on the work out there. With regards to the Communist Chinese state that funds and assists terrorist for their State Owned Enterprises ability to acquire more market shares. 

Over ten years ago, America suffered the worst terrorist attack in its history, caused by a terrorist group largely known as al Qaeda. About a month after theattack, it was first reported that Communist China bought unexploded American cruise missiles from al Qaeda in order to “reverse engineer” them, i.e., use them to advance its own cruise missile capabilities. That report was just confirmed on Nov. 29. The subsequent silence from mainstream media has been deafening. What gives here? For over four years, as the democratic world has fought the War on Terror, Communist China has managed to stay out of sight and out of mind, despite the information above and immediately below. Even the pro-democracy, anti-Communist movement has largely been quiet on this. This remains a terrible anddangerous mistake. For those new to this topic, what follows is a quick synopsis of Communist China’s actions regarding al Qaeda and the Taliban. 1998: After theAmerican cruise missile attack on al Qaeda, Communist China pays up to $10 million to al Qaeda for unexploded American cruise missiles. 1999: A book by two Communist Chinese colonels presents a battle scenario in which the World Trade Center is attacked. The authors recommend Osama bin Laden by name as someone with the ability to orchestrate the attack. September 11, 2001 (yes, that date is correct): Communist China signs a pact on economic cooperation with the Taliban. Just after September 11, 2001: The Communist press agency makes a video “glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow against an arrogant nation.” Also after September 11, 2001: According to Willy Lam (CNN), the Communist leadership considers al Qaeda to be “a check on U.S. power,” and only decides to back away from it after deciding that “now is not the time to take on the United States.” Also after September 11, 2001: As Pakistan mulls a request from the United States to allow its troops to be based there for operations against the Taliban, Communist China—a 50-year Pakistan ally—announces it would “oppose allowing foreign troops in Pakistan.” Also after September 11, 2001: U.S. intelligence finds the Communist Chinese military’s favorite technology firm—Huawei Technologies—building a telephone network in Kabul, the Afghan capital. November 2001: As U.S. Special Forces and local anti-Taliban Afghans are liberating Afghanistan, Communist China, through public statements and behind-the-scenes actions, tries to prevent what it calls “a pro-American regime” in Kabul. 2002: Raids of al Qaeda hideouts by U.S. Special Forces and allies net large caches of weapons from Communist China, including surface-to-air missiles. This comes weeks after the U.S. government warns that al Qaeda terrorists in the U.S. would try to use said missiles to take down American planes. April 2002: Then-Communist Chinese leader Jiang Zemin, while visiting Iran, rips the U.S. military presence in Central Asia. Late summer 2002: Almost a year after Afghanistan’s liberation, a three-man delegation from the Taliban—led by Ustad Khalil, purported to be Mullah Omar’s right-hand man—spends a week in Communist China meeting with cadres, at their invitation. August 2002: Intelligence from the post-Taliban Afghan government reveals that Communist China has turned a part of Pakistan deemed under its control (most likely “Aksai Chin,” the piece ofdisputed Kashmir that Pakistan gave to its longtime ally in the 1960s) into a safe haven for al Qaeda. May 2004: Media reports expose how the Communist Chinese intelligence service used some of its front companies in financial markets around the world to help al Qaeda raise and launder money for its operations. Yet Communist China continues to claim that it is our friend in the War on Terror, and foolish supporters of “engagement” continue to believe it. Nothing could be further from the truth. It’s not merely al Qaeda that has received Communist support (for more on Communist China’s extensive ties to terrorists, check out my book on the subject), but given the nearly universal acceptance of al Qaeda as an enemy of the democratic world, one would think that the above information would be enough for a serious and thorough reexamination of our relations with the Communists. After all, Communist China’s reasons for supporting anti-American terrorists are not difficult to ascertain. The U.S. is the main obstacle to the Communists’ plans for conquering Taiwan, replacing Japan as the lead power in Asia, and replacing the U.S. as the lead world power. If Communist China fails in any of these, its reliance on radical nationalism—the regime’s raison d’etre since the Tiananmen Square massacre—will backfire badly. Thus, the Chinese Communist Party sees the United States as the chief threat to its power, and its survival. Yet President Bush has not once demanded that Communist China end its support for al Qaeda—indeed, he has not even acknowledged the existence of that support. Sadly, he is not alone. In fact, those of us who insist on spreading the word about this are in the distinct minority. If we are to win the War on Terror, this must change. The War on Terror is, in fact, part of the Second Cold War—the cold war between Communist China and the democratic world. As such, the War on Terror can not and will not be won unless the free world sees the Chinese Communist Party for what it really is: an enemy. The road to victory in the War on Terror ends not in Kabul, Baghdad, Tehran, or Damascus, but in Beijing. America and her allies will never be secure until China is free. D.J. McGuire is President and Co-Founder of the China e-Lobby, and the author of Dragon in the Dark: How and Why Communist China Helps Our Enemies in the War on Terror.
Its time for me to speak back. I figure four countries at it with Communist China perfect time to say the same thing to them. 

Insurgents, Raiders, and Bandits: How Masters of Irregular Warfare Have Shaped Our World

Secret Weapon: How Economic Terrorism Brought Down the U.S. Stock Market and Why It Can Happen Again

Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America

The Black Book of Communism Crimes, Terror, Repression

Chinese State Owned Bank Fund Hama's under SASAC's direction

Dragon in the Dark: How and Why Communist China Helps Our Enemies in the War on Terror

China Funding the Darfur Atrocities?

Chinese Billions fund Genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka

Terrorist Sponsors: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China

Communist China Expedites 50 Jet Airplanes to Pakistan to stop US raids on Al Queada

Communist Chinese military invades Indian lands for valuable flower resource

Communist China Invading India daily

China's funded partylist & communist armed rebels in the Philippines

China opens string of spy schoolschina tour

China opens string of spy schools

China opening spy schools to have more intelligence agents

China steps up its intelligence operation with new spy schools

China's Ministry of State Security

Chinese intelligence operations

China's Missile-In A-Box Incident

stratfor on communist terrorist

Chinese military sets up special cyber warfare unit

Cyber Terrorism: Mass Destruction or Mass Disruption?

Why is China a major tourist attraction for the Hamas terrorists?

China saved 3 Pakistan terrorists

China Strings Pearls While US Kills Terrorists

Fears surface over Chinese cable

Worried about China machismo, PM told US

Communist Terrorist Groups

Red Brigades, Italy's Communist Terrorist Group, Threatens Officials

Pakistan's strategy in Occupied Kashmir - 'deny jobs and create terrorists'

Terrorist Sponsors: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China

Terror-Sponsor China Awarded 9-11 Memorial Tower Contract

Bank of China Assists Terrorists?

Is China protecting terrorists in Kashmir?

China Protecting Terrorists From Security Council And USA

West queries China over Pakistan atom ties

China Nurtured Bin Laden And Terrorists

China State Security Ministry is certainly a terrorism organization


Taliban Model Communist Terrorism in Kannur

Communist terrorism

Funding Terrorism in Southeast Asia: The Financial Network of Al Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah

FBI Confidential -- China's Cyber Terrorism?

China's Secret Cyberterrorism

Chinese cyber-EMP terrorism?

China: Stop Supporting State Sponsored Terrorism in Ethiopia

Defectors Expose the Chinese Communist Party's Crimes of Terrorism and Genocide

Roots of Islamic Terrorism: How Communists Helped Fundamentalists

Communist Terrorism

Stop state-sponsored terrorism in Tibet, Parliamentarians tell China

State-Sponsored  Cyberterrorism

Deficit Terrorism" and Economic Warfare

China’s Spies Are Catching Up

‘China helps NE groups with arms’

Communist narcoterrorism entrenched in Colombia's state universities

Defence ministry finds China army profile & Pakistan's take on terrorism as major concerns

China's Double Game on Terrorism

This is the same invasion of Turkestan, Mongolia and Tibet that we have seen before. Based primarily on the need to own resources through the SASAC state owned resource control board. The very same board that set up the last expansion with the Military. Those working personnel are the main espionage target for my research and bugs.
"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas states that countries have exclusive economic zones in areas within 200 nautical miles of their shores."
"The reef—a doughnut-shaped ring of coral several miles in diameter—is 125 nautical miles west of the Philippine Island of Palawan, and well within the Philippines 200 mile economic zone, and 700 nautical miles from Hainan Island, the nearest piece of China land."

No comments:

Post a Comment