Jackson–Vanik amendment: My argument to opening the US further to non market economies.

President Obama wishes to destroy the key legislation that helped destroy the Soviet non market Bloc of Communist Party control.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/26/us-ustr-singapore-idUSBRE83P05J20120426

Key interest of the main legislation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson%E2%80%93Vanik_amendment

The key issue was used to stop the Soviet expansion of spies and espionage agents. Very well. As they where starting proxy wars creating terrorist groups and wished to create a political people's dictatorship throughout the world that they controlled. Today we can see the Communist Chinese doing the same thing that the Soviets did to the Jews to the Falun Gung, along with the same actions of terrorist enrichment and specific state owned espionage at very high level's. President Clinton only normalized trade relations with the Communist Chinese, as an very high espionage agent in the MSS had donated millions to his campaign, and President Clinton sold out highest space tech to them and a navy base to COSCO. That after the congressional hearing was allowed to keep the personal funds he gained and never had to pay them back to the people of the USA for excepting for espionage funds. If it was not for President Clinton Normalizing trade with Communist China. The USA would have a monopoly on world trade, as the Communist Chinese have the worlds highest trade protection laws, strategies and espionage units. While the US is completely open to them.

I do not see how taken this tool off the tool belt will help. President Obama is probable working with Putin to try and get the missile shield in and Putin want's his SOE's to  be able to destroy our market and jobs and suck them away like the Communist Chinese did.

Here is the provision that Putin wishes to destroy by leveraging the President's administration with trade:

"19 USC § 2436 - MARKET DISRUPTION

(a) Investigation by International Trade Commission; report; publication

(1) Upon the filing of a petition by an entity described in section 2252 (a) of this title, upon request of the President or the United States Trade Representative, upon resolution of either the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or on its own motion, the International Trade Commission (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Commission”) shall promptly make an investigation to determine, with respect to imports of an article which is the product of a Communist country, whether market disruption exists with respect to an article produced by a domestic industry.

(2) The provisions of subsections (a)(3), (b)(4), ^[1] and (c)(4) ofsection 2252 of this title shall apply with respect to investigations by the Commission under paragraph (1).

(3) The Commission shall report to the President its determination with respect to each investigation under paragraph (1) and the basis therefor and shall include in each report any dissenting or separate views. If the Commission finds, as a result of its investigation, that market disruption exists with respect to an article produced by a domestic industry, it shall find the amount of the increase in, or imposition of, any duty or other import restriction on such article which is necessary to prevent or remedy such market disruption and shall include such finding in its report to the President. The Commission shall furnish to the President a transcript of the hearings and any briefs which may have been submitted in connection with each investigation.

(4) The report of the Commission of its determination with respect to an investigation under paragraph (1) shall be made at the earliest practicable time, but not later than 3 months after the date on which the petition is filed (or the date on which the request or resolution is received or the motion is adopted, as the case may be). Upon making such report to the President, the Commission shall also promptly make public such report (with the exception of information which the Commission determines to be confidential) and shall cause a summary thereof to be published in the Federal Register.

(b) Affirmative determination

With respect to any affirmative determination of the Commission under subsection (a) of this section—

(1) such determination shall be treated as an affirmative determination made under section 2251 (b) of this title (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988); and

(2) sections 2252 and 2253 of this title (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of such Act of 1988), rather than the provisions of part 1 of subchapter II of this chapter as amended by section 1401 of such Act of 1988, shall apply with respect to the taking of subsequent action, if any, by the President in response to such affirmative determination;

except that—

(A) the President may take action under such sections 2252 and 2253 of this title only with respect to imports from the country or countries involved of the article with respect to which the affirmative determination was made; and

(B) if such action consists of, or includes, an orderly marketing agreement, such agreement shall be entered into within 60 days after the import relief determination date.

(c) Products of Communist countries

If, at any time, the President finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe, with respect to imports of an article which is the product of a Communist country, that market disruption exists with respect to an article produced by a domestic industry, he shall request the Commission to initiate an investigation under subsection (a) of this section. If the President further finds that emergency action is necessary, he may take action under sections 2252 and 2253 of this title referred to in subsection (b) of this section as if an affirmative determination of the Commission had been made under subsection (a) of this section. Any action taken by the President under the preceding sentence shall cease to apply

(1) if a negative determination is made by the Commission under subsection (a) of this section with respect to imports of such article, on the day on which the Commission’s report of such determination is submitted to the President, or

(2) if an affirmative determination is made by the Commission under subsection (a) of this section with respect to imports of such article, on the day on which the action taken by the President pursuant to such determination becomes effective.

(d) Petitions to initiate consultations as provided for by safeguard arrangements

(1) A petition may be filed with the President by an entity described in section 2251 (a)(1) of this title requesting the President to initiate consultations provided for by the safeguard arrangements of any agreement entered into under section 2435 of this title with respect to imports of an article which is the product of the country which is the other party to such agreement.

(2) If the President determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe, with respect to imports of such article, that market disruption exists with respect to an article produced by a domestic industry, he shall initiate consultations with such country with respect to such imports.

(e) Definitions; factors determining existence of market disruption

For purposes of this section—

(1) The term “Communist country” means any country dominated or controlled by communism.

(2)

(A) Market disruption exists within a domestic industry whenever imports of an article, like or directly competitive with an article produced by such domestic industry, are increasing rapidly, either absolutely or relatively, so as to be a significant cause of material injury, or threat thereof, to such domestic industry.

(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A):

(i) Imports of an article shall be considered to be increasing rapidly if there has been a significant increase in such imports (either actual or relative to domestic production) during a recent period of time.

(ii) The term “significant cause” refers to a cause which contributes significantly to the material injury of the domestic industry, but need not be equal to or greater than any other cause.

(C) The Commission, in determining whether market disruption exists, shall consider, among other factors—

(i) the volume of imports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation;

(ii) the effect of imports of the merchandise on prices in the United States for like or directly competitive articles;

(iii) the impact of imports of such merchandise on domestic producers of like or directly competitive articles; and

(iv) evidence of disruptive pricing practices, or other efforts to unfairly manage trade patterns."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/2436

Putin sees the US was very susceptible to Communist State Owned Enterprise trade wars that stripped the US of all of its mine jobs for production materials, while also manufacturing. While also forcing the US into major deficit due to high job loss to non market economies. As Communist China is still 75% run by the Communist Chinese Party. Which even then the other 25% is the Communist Parties family owned free enterprises that are still run by the Communist Chinese Party.. 


If this provision is wiped out of the US tool belt. What it will do is as the Communist Chinese re enrich the world back to the cold war days. When the Soviets where going around enriching Communist Parties and centralized governments to destroy free enterprises and individual land ownership and Democracy. Where currently today the US government can gain exceptions as President Clinton did for his MSS Communist Chinese buddy, proven in the books written about his administration by Republicans working closely and even one Democrat totally against the espionage the president did. 


This then allows the International Communist party or centralist economies, non market economies, to work together in their new Bloc which is now called a Bric. So each country can work to centralize a part of the worlds trade to them. So long as they are under the Communist Chinese values of centralized government. Thus this one single destruction of a tool could literally close areas of forced research before trading with a Communist Party Controlled country, like Iran, North Korea, Russia, or Communist China. I say Russia as still around 50% of their politics is still hard core Soviet's still wishing to take over the world for their mono culture people's dictatorship. 


I would disagree with the destruction of this tool in our belts. As it has shown very good cause for research against Communist Parties, that historically, like the German Socialist, Soviets and Communist Chinese, have gone to world wars with the free markets, German Socialist  WW I WW II, Soviets Cold War Proxies in Latin America, and North Korea and Vietnam Communist China. Thus the restrictions on Communist Countries should stay in place. Just because the MSS Communist Espionage agents where able to get President Clinton as explained in the book about him called disception. Does not mean we should stop worrying about centralized non market economies. Especially as we have seen what trading with the Communist Chinese has done to the world. It has caused major monopolies and resource shortages, while placing them in line to invade their neighbors again like they have before, while creating major world deficits in free markets as SOE's the basses of Communist economic warfare have centralized the worlds trade to them. Literally, all countries are back to the old silk road, all roads lead and end in Communist China. This is true with regards to everything. We have had almost complete open trade with Communist China for 30 years in the West and Free Markets. Yet today they are still one of the worlds highest most protected markets. I do not think going this same route with Russia, as it seeks to destroy us financially, as per its works with the MSS do destroy Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while constantly threatening the US with economic warfare. Is a good idea. 


This article in now way is about human rights. As anyone can get a visa for political issues if they are fleeing a country to leave it. However, if you are immigrating from a Communist State like China, Vietnam, Russia 50%, Iran, or North Korea, to attack the West's core values then of course free immigration should not be allowed. Again anyone can come here they just have to go through the right process. As taken this article down does is say that countries like Iran, North Korea, Russia and Communist China are no longer a threat to free markets. Even though, my five website collections, proxy wars in Africa, Asia, and pretty much anywhere you see a Maoist terrorist or Communist China backed Muslim terrorist cell, is them wishing to destroy us. 


Rider I