This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger
The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"
Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves



http://rideriantieconomicwarfare.blogspot.com/

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiv.blogspot.com/


If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wruckers room


Monday, April 23, 2012

American Activists Foolishly Take A Page From 'Communist Manifesto'

My responses to this articles comment section:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurapennington/2012/04/23/american-activists-foolishly-take-a-page-from-communist-manifesto/2/

1. First and foremost the 1% you speak of are those folks whose family or themselves have been socially adapted via economic votes of value to the leadership chair. So if we take Marxist view how would we decide those who lead our economic major issues. Just by basic popularity, education, or through shear family and competitive ideas of capitalism. Deliberately manipulate the Democracy. You mean if you have their own network of cultural value battles between each other yes. But no the top 1% are just like the other 99%. They are different and do not necessarily like each others values and they play fairly with economics they own. For example you say the top 1% run the government and economics. Well Carter, Clinton, Obama, Bush Sr, Reagan and Nixon all came from poor 99% class families that they competed in society to become voted for the best via economic value and political values.
I do not believe in marxism. As how would capital and labor and seats be divided. In Marxism it is based on a theory he never solves for. Which is spread of power and wealth. In Democracy and Capitalism it is based on competition of votes by economic abilities to lead and values of social governance the whole like as they can see the top economic competitors compete for what they have earned. Which is the best way to decide who leads in my opinion. Marxism is a genocidal spread of slave labor to those who are the most oppressive and willing to be the most criminal to lead.
Rider i
Anti Economic Warfare Blog Post.


Then MY response to 
johnfranklinmasonjohnfranklinmason 3 hours ago
Maura Pennington you would have us believe the government of we the people, by the people and for the collective of we the people of the United States is a Communist, Marxist, Socialist concept. Never mind it has worker so well for Capitalism and making the United States the great prosperous Nation it is.
Communism, Socialism and Marxism propaganda is a call to arms, targets and enlist “suckers” to blindly support special interests under the auspicies of patriotism. The same interests that have undermined the value of labor in America and created employment and grew the economy in Communist China for the benefit of a few and detriment of many here in the United States.
The Founding Fathers and their irk, the Private Sector, oppressed millions with slavery in the United States. It was the Private Sector in America who kidnapped, enslaved, raped, branded, tortured, maimed and murdered tens of millions for generations over two hundred years with impunity.
No other people, nowhere on earth, throughout history oppressed so many for so long and so bad.


Economic Warfare Ins Just posted
The Private sector raped, oppressed, and enslaved for over two hundred years. mmm curious. Your wrong slavery has been around for thousands of years. Where whole socialist governments like Egypt, and many Feudalistic societies based on religious communism, god thus placed you in our leadership you are the best placed there just because. Everyone else labors and is given home, food, entertainment and protection. Feaduism, or slaver as you will. Private sector is a word you seem to think is at the result of slavery. Again wrong. Private sector was the one that ended world slaverly my friend. It went from Full Government socialist enslavements like Egypt to Feudalism where slave dirvers need not be on the property to watch. Then to Democracy where individuals own their own. Slavery again was based on the slavery you so suckerly speak of was because of African socialist governments selling their people as slaves, as did many socialist governments, or fedualist governments did before that. In which, folks like Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and the rest wrote that they are working on destroying slavery with free markets. So all humans can be free and own their own. Again they just used slaverly for a very short time, 200 years is not reality, as maybe the first 50 years then after that slaverly serioulsy started to break up and individuals started the green lantern or what you know as the underground railroad. Which is only dated to a specific time after it was found.
So again friend your wrong we have come from socialist and communism (feudalism) into free markets. The free markets or privatization has almost completely done with slaverly in the world. Thanks to all cultures being able to own their own individual lands, property and weapons, along with political affilations. So my brother, in the guerilla hat. You speaking to a Mac. Private enterprises freed the African’s and the world slaves.
Rider i


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)