My Comments on this article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-25/chinese-writers-seek-17-million-judgment-against-china-in-u-s-.html
No Badiu operates here in the US and has bases here in the US. It has no sovereignty if it has a brick and morter here in the US. As they allow porn cites through that they do not allow through in Communist China. So they can follow our laws if they operate here in the states. Which is freedom of speech. The Baidu servers have to be here in the states thus somebody from Baidu has to be here to deal with them. That means they operate a business certificate here in the states. If they can be forced to censor porn cites in Communist China. They can be forced to not censor cites as per our laws in the USA. As long as they are licensed to operate in the US servers or through our commerce of international. The Federal government can regulate it, as per the commerce statute. It would be like blocking an African American civil rights website inside of the USA. That would be a no brainier, or it would be like blocking a woman's advocate cite in the USA, also no brainier. For some reason a cite that preaches the same qualities as the above is an issue.
Rider I
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-25/chinese-writers-seek-17-million-judgment-against-china-in-u-s-.html
No Badiu operates here in the US and has bases here in the US. It has no sovereignty if it has a brick and morter here in the US. As they allow porn cites through that they do not allow through in Communist China. So they can follow our laws if they operate here in the states. Which is freedom of speech. The Baidu servers have to be here in the states thus somebody from Baidu has to be here to deal with them. That means they operate a business certificate here in the states. If they can be forced to censor porn cites in Communist China. They can be forced to not censor cites as per our laws in the USA. As long as they are licensed to operate in the US servers or through our commerce of international. The Federal government can regulate it, as per the commerce statute. It would be like blocking an African American civil rights website inside of the USA. That would be a no brainier, or it would be like blocking a woman's advocate cite in the USA, also no brainier. For some reason a cite that preaches the same qualities as the above is an issue.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment